I asked Slant what Linux Git GUI was best, sifted through some editor plugins and “minimal” clients, and decided to try GitKraken. What they don’t have, however, is a Linux version (preemptive snark: “That’s because people who use Linux don’t use GUIs!”). I have this hanging by my desk at the office I haven’t seen since mid-March. Updates come frequently, and they even have cool merch. It’s beautiful, intuitive, feature-rich, and powerful. I mean, I can google “cherry pick” for those rare times I use it, or I can choose it from the menu and not worry about mangling things in Git history. Why? Primarily for reviewing diffs and history, or for performing rarely used operations. The CLI is usually quicker, and I’m usually in the terminal anyway, but yet I also use a GUI. Not always, and not even most of the time. See moreI’ll confess: I use a GUI for Git. If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost. With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent. Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.
#GITKRAKEN VS TOWER FREE#
Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting.
I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free! I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go. I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts: Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching).
PostgreSQL as preferred database system.Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management.nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment).Heroku for deploying in test environments.Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers.VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests.Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
#GITKRAKEN VS TOWER CODE#
0 kommentar(er)
